Bryson, Alex, Gomez, Rafael and Willman, Paul (2008) Trading places: employers, unions and the manufacture of voice. CEP Discussion Paper (884). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance, London, UK. ISBN 9780853282914
|
PDF
Download (148kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Using nationally representative workplace data for Britain we show that over the last quarter century union voice – especially union-only voice – has been associated with poorer climate, more industrial action, poorer financial performance and poorer labour productivity than nonunion voice and, in particular, direct voice. On the other hand, union-based voice regimes have experienced lower quit rates than non-union and “no voice” regimes, as theory predicts. Over that time, while the workplace incidence of voice has remained constant, with roughly 8 workplaces out of 10 providing some form of voice, there has been a big shift from union to non-union voice, particularly direct employer-made voice. Thus employers are prepared generally to bear the costs of voice provision and manifest a reluctance to engage with their workforce without voice mechanisms in place. The associations between non-union voice mechanisms and desirable workplace outcomes suggest that these costs may be lower than the benefits voice generates.
Actions (login required)
View Item |