Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Empirical analysis reveals significant discrepancy between journal reputation and perceived relevance in economics.

Haucap, Justus (2015) Empirical analysis reveals significant discrepancy between journal reputation and perceived relevance in economics. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (11 May 2015). Website.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (126kB) | Preview

Abstract

Using survey data on the evaluations of 150 economics journals, a recent study explored the relationship between economics journals’ reputation and perceived relevance amongst economists working in the field. Justus Haucap shares some of the headline findings from the analysis based on the survey data. The findings suggest that a journal’s relevance is driven by average article quality, while reputation depends more on truly exceptional articles.

Item Type: Online resource (Website)
Official URL: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences
Additional Information: © 2015 The Author(s) CC BY 3.0
Divisions: LSE
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Sets: Collections > Impact of Social Sciences Blog at LSE
Date Deposited: 24 Mar 2017 14:55
Last Modified: 08 Jun 2021 23:20
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/70696

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics