Haucap, Justus
(2015)
Empirical analysis reveals significant discrepancy between journal reputation and perceived relevance in economics.
Impact of Social Sciences Blog
(11 May 2015).
Website.
Abstract
Using survey data on the evaluations of 150 economics journals, a recent study explored the relationship between economics journals’ reputation and perceived relevance amongst economists working in the field. Justus Haucap shares some of the headline findings from the analysis based on the survey data. The findings suggest that a journal’s relevance is driven by average article quality, while reputation depends more on truly exceptional articles.
Actions (login required)
![View Item View Item](/style/images/action_view.png) |
View Item |