Howson, Colin 
  
(2015)
David Hume's no-miracles argument begets a valid No-Miracles Argument.
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 54.
     pp. 41-45.
     ISSN 0039-3681
  
  
  
  
  
    
  
    
      
      
    
  
  
    
  
  
    Abstract
    Hume's essay ‘Of Miracles’ has been a focus of controversy ever since its publication. The challenge to Christian orthodoxy was only too evident, but the balance-of-probabilities criterion advanced by Hume for determining when testimony justifies belief in miracles has also been a subject of contention among philosophers. The temptation for those familiar with Bayesian methodology to show that Hume's criterion determines a corresponding balance-of-posterior probabilities in favour of miracles is understandable, but I will argue that their attempts fail. However, I show that his criterion generates a valid form of the so-called No-Miracles Argument appealed to by modern realist philosophers, whose own presentation of it, despite their possession of the probabilistic machinery Hume himself lacked, is invalid.
  
  
  
  
  
    Actions (login required)
    
    
      
          | 
        View Item |