Adams, Jon (2011) Opposition to impact criteria stems from disciplines wanting to retain their own systems of quality control and their distinctive identities. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (30 Aug 2011). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (51kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The inclusion of impact measurement in the 2014 REF has generated anxiety and unease for academics, especially those in the humanities. This anxiety is connected to the university’s need to preserve disciplinary autonomy writes Jon Adams, who considers how impact passes a crucial element of control out of the hands of the departments, and into the hands of the public.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2011 The Author |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
| Date Deposited: | 22 Aug 2013 11:47 |
| Last Modified: | 15 Sep 2023 18:19 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/51843 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics