Heller, Lambert (2018) Beyond #FakeScience: how to overcome shallow certainty in scholarly communication. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (02 Aug 2018). Website.
Text
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (75kB) |
Abstract
Recent media reports in Germany have brought renewed focus on predatory publishing practices and seen a notably increased use of the term "fake science". But to what extent is this a worsening problem? Lambert Heller argues that predatory publishing has never really become a big thing, and that it became a thing at all is largely attributable to the simple fact of publication in a scholarly journal coming to be seen as an instant “seal of approval” for a research article, as well as more widespread issues with the peer review process. Transparency is the best remedy for the harm caused by predatory publishing practices; when openness of peer review becomes a default, publishers would have a hard time faking it.
Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018... |
Additional Information: | © 2018 The Author |
Divisions: | LSE |
Subjects: | L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
Date Deposited: | 02 Jan 2019 11:39 |
Last Modified: | 12 Dec 2024 06:54 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/91431 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |