Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Motivated reasoning during recruitment

Kappes, Heather Barry ORCID: 0000-0002-6335-3888, Balcetis, Emily and De Cremer, David (2018) Motivated reasoning during recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (3). pp. 270-280. ISSN 0021-9010

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (526kB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.1037/apl0000263

Abstract

This research shows how job postings can lead job candidates to see themselves as particularly deserving of hiring and high salary. We propose that these entitlement beliefs entail both personal motivations to see oneself as deserving and the ability to justify those motivated judgments. Accordingly, we predict that people feel more deserving when qualifications for a job are vague and thus amenable to motivated reasoning, whereby people use information selectively to reach a desired conclusion. We tested this hypothesis with a two-phase experiment (N = 892) using materials drawn from real online job postings. In the first phase of the experiment, participants believed themselves to be more deserving of hiring and deserving of higher pay after reading postings composed of vaguer types of qualifications. In the second phase, yoked observers believed that participants were less entitled overall, but did not selectively discount endorsement of vaguer qualifications, suggesting they were unaware of this effect. A follow-up pre-registered experiment (N = 905) using postings with mixed qualification types replicated the effect of including more vague qualifications on participants’ entitlement beliefs. Entitlement beliefs are widely seen as problematic for recruitment and retention, and these results suggest that reducing the inclusion of vague qualifications in job postings would dampen the emergence of these beliefs in applicants, albeit at the cost of decreasing application rates and lowering applicants’ confidence.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/apl/
Additional Information: © 2017 American Psychological Association. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal.
Divisions: Management
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Date Deposited: 24 Aug 2017 08:53
Last Modified: 12 Oct 2024 17:06
Funders: London School of Economics
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/84093

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics