Dunleavy, Patrick 
ORCID: 0000-0002-2650-6398 and Tinkler, Jane
(2012)
REF Advice Notes 3: What will Hefce count as ‘under-pinning’ research?
Impact of Social Sciences Blog
(29 Oct 2012).
Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (124kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Many possible Impact Cases are likely to raise issues about whether they are sufficiently grounded on what the REF audit Panels can recognize as ‘2* research’. The Funding Council’s overly restrictive ‘physical science’ view of how research influences policy has created an artificial minefield of pointless obstacles. However, Jane Tinkler and Patrick Dunleavy show how with skill and persistence, departments can navigate successfully past these dangers.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences |
| Additional Information: | © 2012 The Author(s) CC BY 3.0 |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Apr 2017 08:45 |
| Last Modified: | 15 Sep 2023 18:41 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/72479 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics