Madonna, Anthony J., Monogan III, James E. and Vining Jr, Richard L. (2016) If the next president wants to put an ideologue on the Supreme Court, they will have to sacrifice their initial domestic policy goals. USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog (25 Oct 2016). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (167kB) | Preview |
Abstract
One of the first tasks for the new president this January – whoever they may be – could be to nominate a new justice to the Supreme Court. But how should the next president go about this? In new research, Anthony J. Madonna, James E. Monogan III, and Richard L. Vining, Jr. find that the more a president supports a particular Supreme Court nominee, the lower the chance that they can get a major new policy initiative through the Senate. If the new president wishes to focus on achieving their policy goals in their first 150 days, they argue, they should compromise by appointing a moderate to the Supreme Court, rather than an ideologue.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2016 The Authors, USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog, The London School of Economics and Political Science © CC BY-NC 3.0 |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) J Political Science > JK Political institutions (United States) K Law > K Law (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 29 Nov 2016 09:23 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 14:58 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/68410 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics