Tennant, Jon (2016) Breaking the traditional mould of peer review: why we need a more transparent process of research evaluation. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (17 Feb 2016). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (98kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Jon Tennant takes a look at the transformations underway aimed at tackling the widespread dissatisfaction with the system of peer review. He provides further background on the platform ScienceOpen, which seeks to enable a process of transparent, self-regulating, peer review, where knowledge sharing is encouraged, valued, and rewarded. By adopting a more transparent process of research evaluation, we move one step closer towards a fairer and democratic research process.
Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/ |
Additional Information: | © 2016 LSE Impact of Social Sciences © CC BY 3.0 |
Divisions: | LSE |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > L Education (General) |
Date Deposited: | 23 Mar 2016 16:36 |
Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 14:49 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/65849 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |