Saltman, Richard B. (2015) In the current bitterly contested political atmosphere, theSupreme Court’s second decision on Obamacare has resolvedlittle. USApp– American Politics and Policy Blog (26 Jun 2015). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (134kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This week, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of subsides which support federal health insurance exchanges which operate in the states under the Affordable Care Act. Richard B. Saltman writes that the core argument over Obamacare goes beyond the role of these subsidies and that many who oppose it do so on the grounds that it is an expensive federalization of health care. He argues that the Supreme Court has clearly and intentionally misread the clear and intentional language of the Affordable Care Act, and in doing so has only moved the controversy and debate on to the 2016 Presidential election.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2015 The Author, USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog, The London School of Economics and Political Science. |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | J Political Science > JK Political institutions (United States) K Law > KF United States Federal Law R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine |
| Date Deposited: | 10 Jul 2015 15:19 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Oct 2024 17:03 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/62677 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics