Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike

Locke, Richard M., Qin, Fei and Brause, Alberto (2007) Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61 (1). pp. 1-31. ISSN 0019-7939

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (585kB) | Preview

• Publisher

Abstract

Using a unique data set based on factory audits of working conditions in over 800 of Nike’s suppliers across 51 countries over the years 1998–2005, the authors explore whether monitoring for compliance with corporate codes of conduct—currently the principal way both global corporations and labor rights non-governmental organizations (NGOs) address poor working conditions in global supply chain factories—achieved remediation, as indicated by improved working conditions and stepped-up enforcement of labor rights. Despite substantial efforts and investments by Nike and its staff to improve working conditions among its suppliers, monitoring alone appears to have produced only limited results. However, when monitoring efforts were combined with other interventions focused on tackling some of the root causes of poor working conditions— in particular, by enabling suppliers to better schedule their work and to improve quality and efficiency—working conditions seem to have improved considerably.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/
Additional Information:	© 2007 Cornell University
Divisions:	Management
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Date Deposited:	08 Sep 2014 08:41
Last Modified:	21 Apr 2024 22:03
Funders:	Hewlett Foundation, MIT Sloan School of Management’s Dean’s Innovation Fund
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/59405

Actions (login required)

View Item