Blog Admin, Impact of Social Sciences, (2011) Peer review should not be such a dominant process in determining research funding allocation, RAND argues. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (19 Jul 2011). Website.
|
PDF
Download (32kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Peer review is not always the best methodology for research funding processes, and diverse strategies should be used, according to a report by policy research organisation RAND Europe.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2011 Impact of Social Sciences |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
| Date Deposited: | 22 Aug 2013 09:32 |
| Last Modified: | 10 Sep 2025 07:06 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/51823 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics