Addressing controversial ideas in philosophy class: a critical-hermeneutical lens

Widmer, Elisabeth (2025) Addressing controversial ideas in philosophy class: a critical-hermeneutical lens. Educational Philosophy and Theory. ISSN 0013-1857 (In Press)

Text (Addressing_Controversial_Ideas_in_Philos-2) - Accepted Version Pending embargo until 1 January 2100. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (282kB)

Abstract

The history of political philosophy is certainly not without its share of morally objectionable ideas. Aristotle’s notion of natural slavery, the subordination of women in Rousseau, and Kant’s hierarchy of the races are just a few examples from a long list of morally problematic concepts encountered in the study of political thought. In this article, I argue that our moral discomfort is a pedagogically valuable starting point for critically engaging with political theories that contain controversial ideas. By developing a “critical-hermeneutical” framework that fosters a nuanced understanding of theories as both enablers of emancipation and solidifiers of domination, I aim to demonstrate how philosophy educators can design their courses in a socially responsible manner by transforming adverse or affirmative reactions to morally objectionable ideas into opportunities for engaging critically with a text.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2025 The Author
Divisions:	Government
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) H Social Sciences L Education
Date Deposited:	15 Aug 2025 10:57
Last Modified:	20 Aug 2025 16:51
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/129140

Actions (login required)

View Item