Ayrton, Rachel (2014) Competing loyalties: Dilemmas arising from violent outbreak in a planned research site, South Sudan. Field Research Method Lab Blog (04 Sep 2014). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (106kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Researchers choose field sites for a wide range of theoretical, ideological, interpersonal or pragmatic reasons, usually combined. Some of these rationales are acknowledged, while others remain unacknowledged and hidden from either external or the researcher’s own reflection. However, where these sites focus on conflict or post-conflict settings, the disruptive influence of violence brings with it the expectation of volatility. In this post I examine the reasons underlying my choice of South Sudan as the field site for my PhD research, which were exposed when, as a result of tragically renewed conflict in South Sudan in December 2013, I had to review my approach. Situated within the dilemma of whether to maintain continuity in the research population or the research questions in view of an externally necessitated change to a research project, I relate competing ‘expert views’ that I was presented with as I evaluated the options available, and my own reflection on the emotional content of field site choices, writes Rachel Ayrton.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/fieldresearch/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2014 The Author(s) |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology L Education > LB Theory and practice of education L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
| Date Deposited: | 09 Jun 2017 08:50 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 23:42 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/80661 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics