Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Peer review should not be such a dominant process in determining research funding allocation, RAND argues

Blog Admin, Impact of Social Sciences, (2011) Peer review should not be such a dominant process in determining research funding allocation, RAND argues. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (19 Jul 2011). Website.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (32kB) | Preview

Abstract

Peer review is not always the best methodology for research funding processes, and diverse strategies should be used, according to a report by policy research organisation RAND Europe.

Item Type: Online resource (Website)
Official URL: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Additional Information: © 2011 Impact of Social Sciences; Online
Divisions: LSE
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
Sets: Collections > Impact of Social Sciences Blog at LSE
Date Deposited: 22 Aug 2013 09:32
Last Modified: 30 Jun 2020 23:09
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/51823

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics