Fitness to plead: development and validation of a standardised assessment instrument

Brown, Penelope, Stahl, Daniel, Appiah-Kusi, Elizabeth, Brewer, Rebecca, Watts, Michael, Peay, Jill and Blackwood, Nigel (2018) Fitness to plead: development and validation of a standardised assessment instrument. PLOS ONE, 13 (4). ISSN 1932-6203

Preview

Text - Published Version Download (582kB) | Preview

• Author

Abstract

The ability of an individual to participate in courtroom proceedings is assessed by clinicians using legal `fitness to plead' criteria. Findings of 'unfitness' are so rare that there is considerable professional unease concerning the utility of the current subjective assessment process. As a result, mentally disordered defendants may be subjected unfairly to criminal trials. The Law Commission in England and Wales has proposed legal reform, as well as the utilisation of a defined psychiatric instrument to assist in fitness to plead assessments. Similar legal reforms are occurring in other jurisdictions. Our objective was to produce and validate a standardised assessment instrument of fitness to plead employing a filmed vignette of criminal proceedings. The instrument was developed in consultation with legal and clinical professionals, and was refined using standard item reduction methods in two initial rounds of testing (n = 212). The factorial structure, test-retest reliability and convergent validity of the resultant instrument were assessed in a further round (n = 160). As a result of this iterative process a 25-item scale was produced, with an underlying two-factor structure representing the foundational and decision-making abilities underpinning fitness to plead. The sub-scales demonstrate good internal consistency (factor 1: 0.76; factor 2: 0.65) and testretest stability (0.7) as well as excellent convergent validity with scores of intelligence, executive function and mentalising abilities (p≤0.01 in all domains). Overall the standardised Fitness to Plead Assessment instrument has good psychometric properties. It has the potential to ensure that the significant numbers of mentally ill and cognitively impaired individuals who face trial are objectively assessed, and the courtroom process critically informed.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://journals.plos.org/plosone/
Additional Information:	© 2018 The Authors
Divisions:	Law
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General) R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Date Deposited:	04 May 2018 10:33
Last Modified:	29 Feb 2024 20:00
Projects:	AJU/35238, 099009/Z/12/Z
Funders:	Nuffield Trust Access to Justice, Wellcome Trust, Nuffield Trust
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/87768

Actions (login required)

View Item