Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

A systematic review of factors influencing NHS health check uptake: invitation methods, patient characteristics, and the impact of interventions

Bunten, Amanda, Porter, Lucy, Gold, Natalie and Bogle, Vanessa (2020) A systematic review of factors influencing NHS health check uptake: invitation methods, patient characteristics, and the impact of interventions. BMC Public Health, 20 (1). ISSN 1471-2458

[img] Text (A systematic review of factors influencing NHS health check uptake) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (906kB)
Identification Number: 10.1186/s12889-019-7889-4

Abstract

Background The NHS Health Check (NHSHC) is a risk assessment for those aged 40–74 without a pre-existing condition in England, with the aim of preventing stroke, kidney disease, heart disease, type 2 diabetes and dementia. Uptake has been lower than anticipated. Ensuring that a high percentage of eligible patients receive a NHSHC is key to optimising the clinical and cost effectiveness of the programme. The aim of this systematic review is to highlight interventions and invitation methods that increase the uptake of NHSHCs, and to identify whether the effectiveness of these interact with broader patient and contextual factors. Method A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist. Papers were eligible if they explored the impact of at least one of (i) interventions, (ii) invitation methods or (iii) broader factors on NHSHC uptake. Ten databases were searched in January 2016 and seven were searched in March 2018. Nine-hundred-and-forty-five papers were identified, 238 were screened and 64 full texts were assessed for eligibility. Nine studies were included in the review. Results The nine studies were all from peer reviewed journals. They included two randomised controlled trials, one observational cohort and six cross-sectional studies. Different invitation methods may be more effective for different groups of patients based on their ethnicity and gender. One intervention to enhance invitation letters effectively increased uptake but another did not. In addition, individual patient characteristics (such as age, gender, ethnicity and risk level) were found to influence uptake. This review also finds that uptake varies significantly by GP practice, which could be due either to unidentified practice-level factors or deprivation. Conclusions Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of different invitation methods for different population groups. Research should examine how existing invitation methods can be enhanced to drive uptake whilst reducing health inequalities.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/
Additional Information: © 2020 Crown copyright
Divisions: CPNSS
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Date Deposited: 18 Mar 2021 11:27
Last Modified: 20 Apr 2021 03:21
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/109223

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics