Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Are some areas more equal than others? Socioeconomic inequality in potentially avoidable emergency hospital admissions within English local authority areas

Sheringham, Jessica, Asaria, Miqdad ORCID: 0000-0002-3538-4417, Barratt, Helen, Raine, Rosalind and Cookson, Richard (2016) Are some areas more equal than others? Socioeconomic inequality in potentially avoidable emergency hospital admissions within English local authority areas. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 22 (2). pp. 83-90. ISSN 1355-8196

[img] Text (Are some areas more equal than others?) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (168kB)

Identification Number: 10.1177/1355819616679198

Abstract

ObjectivesReducing health inequalities is an explicit goal of England?s health system. Our aim was to compare the performance of English local administrative areas in reducing socioeconomic inequality in emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive chronic conditions.MethodsWe used local authority area as a stable proxy for health and long-term care administrative geography between 2004/5 and 2011/12. We linked inpatient hospital activity, deprivation, primary care, and population data to small area neighbourhoods (typical population 1500) within administrative areas (typical population 250,000). We measured absolute inequality gradients nationally and within each administrative area using neighbourhood-level linear models of the relationship between national deprivation and age?sex-adjusted emergency admission rates. We assessed local equity performance by comparing local inequality against national inequality to identify areas significantly more or less equal than expected; evaluated stability over time; and identified where equity performance was steadily improving or worsening. We then examined associations between change in socioeconomic inequalities and change in within-area deprivation (gentrification). Finally, we used administrative area-level random and fixed effects models to examine the contribution of primary care to inequalities in admissions.ResultsData on 316 administrative areas were included in the analysis. Local inequalities were fairly stable between consecutive years, but 32 areas (10%) showed steadily improving or worsening equity. In the 21 improving areas, the gap between most and least deprived fell by 3.9 admissions per 1000 (six times the fall nationally) between 2004/5 and 2011/12, while in the 11 areas worsening, the gap widened by 2.4. There was no indication that measured improvements in local equity were an artefact of gentrification or that changes in primary care supply or quality contributed to changes in inequality.ConclusionsLocal equity performance in reducing inequality in emergency admissions varies both geographically and over time. Identifying this variation could provide insights into which local delivery strategies are most effective in reducing such inequalities.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2016 The Authors
Divisions: LSE Health
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Date Deposited: 29 Jul 2019 15:00
Last Modified: 20 Apr 2021 03:03
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/101241

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics