Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Striving for a societal perspective: a framework for economic evaluations when costs and effects fall on multiple sectors and decision-makers

Walker, S., Griffin, Susan, Asaria, Miqdad ORCID: 0000-0002-3538-4417, Tsuchyia, Aki and Sculpher, Mark (2019) Striving for a societal perspective: a framework for economic evaluations when costs and effects fall on multiple sectors and decision-makers. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 17 (5). pp. 577-590. ISSN 1175-5652

[img] Text (Walker2019_Article_StrivingForASocietalPerspectiv) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (971kB)

Identification Number: 10.1007/s40258-019-00481-8


In most societies, resources are distributed by individuals acting in markets and by governments through some form of collective decision-making process. Economic evaluation offers a set of tools to inform collective decisions by examining the resource requirements and outcomes of alternative policies. The ‘societal perspective’ has been advocated, but less consideration has been given to what this should include and its practical implementation. This paper presents a framework for economic evaluation of policies with costs and outcomes falling on different sectors (e.g. health, criminal justice, education) and involving different decision makers. It extends the ‘impact inventory’ developed by the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine by considering all affected individuals and reflecting how outcomes attributed to an intervention can be compared with outcomes forgone as a result of resources not being available for other purposes. The framework sets out the series of assessments to be made, distinguishing points at which value judgements feed into the evaluation, and the implications of alternative judgements. These assessments reflect the institutional arrangements of public bodies, for example, their funding, the outcomes they consider important and their relative valuations of these outcomes. By avoiding the use of an abstract ‘societal perspective’, the contribution of the framework is to inform multiple decision makers with different objectives and provide practical guidance on overall societal impact.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Divisions: LSE Health
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
Date Deposited: 01 May 2019 08:09
Last Modified: 20 Jun 2021 02:34

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics