Cohen, Philip
(2017)
The next stage of SocArXiv's development: bringing greater transparency and efficiency to the peer review process.
Impact of Social Sciences Blog
(16 Oct 2017).
Website.
Abstract
Almost 1,500 papers have been uploaded to SocArXiv since its launch last year. Up to now the platform has operated alongside the peer-review journal system rather than seriously disrupting it. Looking ahead to the next stage of its development, Philip Cohen considers how SocArXiv might challenge the peer review system to be more efficient and transparent, firstly by confronting the bias that leads many who benefit from the status quo to characterise mooted alternatives as extreme. The value and implications of openness at the various decision points in the system must be debated, as should potentially more disruptive innovations such as non-exclusive review and publication or crowdsourcing reviews.
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |