Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Honest, open, proud for adolescents with mental illness: Pilot randomized controlled trial

Mulfinger, Nadine, Müller, Sabine, Böge, Isabel, Sakar, Vehbi, Corrigan, Patrick W., Evans-Lacko, Sara ORCID: 0000-0003-4691-2630, Nehf, Luise, Djamali, Julia, Samarelli, Anna, Kempter, Michael, Ruckes, Christian, Libal, Gerhard, Oexle, Nathalie, Noterdaeme, Michele and Rüsch, Nicolas (2018) Honest, open, proud for adolescents with mental illness: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59 (6). pp. 684-691. ISSN 0021-9630

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (535kB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.1111/jcpp.12853

Abstract

Background: Due to public stigma or self-stigma and shame, many adolescents with mental illness (MI) struggle with the decision whether to disclose their MI to others. Both disclosure and non-disclosure are associated with risks and benefits. Honest, Open, Proud (HOP) is a peer-led group program that supports participants with disclosure decisions in order to reduce stigma’s impact. Previously, HOP had only been evaluated among adults with MI. Methods: This two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial included 98 adolescents with MI. Participants were randomly assigned to HOP and treatment as usual (TAU) or to TAU alone. Outcomes were assessed pre (T0/baseline), post (T1/after the HOP program) and at 3-week follow-up (T2/six weeks after T0). Primary endpoints were stigma stress at T1 and quality of life at T2. Secondary outcomes included self-stigma, disclosure-related distress, empowerment, help-seeking intentions, recovery, and depressive symptoms. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials (NCT02751229; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Results: Compared to TAU, adolescents in the HOP program showed significantly reduced stigma stress at T1 (d=0.92, p<.001) and increased quality of life at T2 (d=0.60, p=.004). In a longitudinal mediation model, the latter effect was fully mediated by stigma stress reduction at T1. HOP further showed significant positive effects on self-stigma, disclosure-related distress, secrecy, help-seeking intentions, attitudes to disclosure, recovery and depressive symptoms. Effects at T1 remained stable or improved further at follow-up. In a limited economic evaluation HOP was cost-efficient in relation to gains in quality of life. Conclusions: As HOP is a compact three-session program and showed positive effects on stigma and disclosure variables as well as on symptoms and quality of life, it could help to reduce stigma’s negative impact among adolescents with MI.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(IS...
Additional Information: © 2017 The Authors
Divisions: Care Policy and Evaluation Centre
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Date Deposited: 28 Nov 2017 10:44
Last Modified: 11 Dec 2024 21:32
Funders: Nachwuchsakademie Versorgungsforschung Baden-Württemberg, Kässbohrer Foundation
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/85768

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics