Sustained effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Healthy Activity Program, a brief psychological treatment for depression delivered by lay counsellors in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

Weobong, Benedict, Weiss, Helen A., McDaid, David ORCID: 0000-0003-0744-2664, Singla, Daisy R., Hollon, Steven D., Nadkarni, Abhijit, Park, A-La ORCID: 0000-0002-4704-4874, Bhat, Bhargav, Katti, Basavaraj, Anand, Arpita, Dimidjian, Sona, Araya, Ricardo, King, Michael, Vijayakumar, Lakshmi, Wilson, G. Terence, Velleman, Richard, Kirkwood, Betty R., Fairburn, Christopher G. and Patel, Vikram (2017) Sustained effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Healthy Activity Program, a brief psychological treatment for depression delivered by lay counsellors in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS Medicine. ISSN 1549-1277

Preview

Text - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background The Healthy Activity Programme (HAP), a brief behavioural intervention delivered by lay counsellors, enhanced remission over 3 months among primary care attendees with depression in peri-urban and rural settings in India. We evaluated the sustainability of the effects after treatment termination, the cost-effectiveness of HAP over 12 months, and the effects of the hypothesized mediator of activation on clinical outcomes. Methods and findings Primary care attendees aged 18–65 years screened with moderately severe to severe depression on the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) were randomised to either HAP plus enhanced usual care (EUC) (n = 247) or EUC alone (n = 248), of whom 95% completed assessments at 3 months, and 91% at 12 months. Primary outcomes were severity on the Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II) and remission on the PHQ-9. HAP participants maintained the gains they showed at the end of treatment through the 12-month follow-up (difference in mean BDI-II score between 3 and 12 months = −0.34; 95% CI −2.37, 1.69; p = 0.74), with lower symptom severity scores than participants who received EUC alone (adjusted mean difference in BDI-II score = −4.45; 95% CI −7.26, −1.63; p = 0.002) and higher rates of remission (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.36; 95% CI 1.15, 1.61; p < 0.009). They also fared better on most secondary outcomes, including recovery (aPR = 1.98; 95% CI 1.29, 3.03; p = 0.002), any response over time (aPR = 1.45; 95% CI 1.27, 1.66; p < 0.001), higher likelihood of reporting a minimal clinically important difference (aPR = 1.42; 95% CI 1.17, 1.71; p < 0.001), and lower likelihood of reporting suicidal behaviour (aPR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.51, 1.01; p = 0.06). HAP plus EUC also had a marginal effect on WHO Disability Assessment Schedule score at 12 months (aPR = −1.58; 95% CI −3.33, 0.17; p = 0.08); other outcomes (days unable to work, intimate partner violence toward females) did not statistically significantly differ between the two arms. Economic analyses indicated that HAP plus EUC was dominant over EUC alone, with lower costs and better outcomes; uncertainty analysis showed that from this health system perspective there was a 95% chance of HAP being cost-effective, given a willingness to pay threshold of Intl$16,060—equivalent to GDP per capita in Goa—per quality-adjusted life year gained. Patient-reported behavioural activation level at 3 months mediated the effect of the HAP intervention on the 12-month depression score (β = −2.62; 95% CI −3.28, −1.97; p < 0.001). Serious adverse events were infrequent, and prevalence was similar by arm. We were unable to assess possible episodes of remission and relapse that may have Conclusions HAP’s superiority over EUC at the end of treatment was largely stable over time and was mediated by patient activation. HAP provides better outcomes at lower costs from a perspective covering publicly funded healthcare services and productivity impacts on patients and their families. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN95149997

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/
Additional Information:	© 2017 The Authors © CC BY 4.0
Divisions:	Care Policy and Evaluation Centre
Subjects:	R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Date Deposited:	22 Aug 2017 12:01
Last Modified:	21 Nov 2024 08:45
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/84070

Actions (login required)

View Item