Credit for research outputs should go to the originating institution but with a transitional arrangement for this REF cycle

Sweeney, David (2017) Credit for research outputs should go to the originating institution but with a transitional arrangement for this REF cycle. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (25 Jul 2017). Website.

Preview

Text - Published Version Download (55kB) | Preview

• Publisher

Abstract

One of the most contentious aspects of the Stern review of the 2014 REF was the recommendation that research outputs should not be portable in future exercises. The subsequent consultation revealed a significant minority to be in support of this, echoing Stern’s concerns that current rules distort investment incentives and encourage rent-seeking. However, a majority opposed this recommendation as stifling of researcher mobility, with many also highlighting the disruption caused by a mid-cycle change. David Sweeney explains that the Stern recommendation will be implemented but that one of two proposed transitional arrangements should also be set in place for the current cycle.

Item Type:	Online resource (Website)
Official URL:	http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Additional Information:	© 2017 The Author(s)
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Date Deposited:	04 Oct 2017 10:13
Last Modified:	14 Sep 2024 01:32
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/83912

Actions (login required)

View Item