Black, Julia 
ORCID: 0000-0002-5838-3265
(2000)
Proceduralising regulation: part I.
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20 (4).
pp. 597-614.
ISSN 0143-6503
Abstract
The first part of this article set out two possible models of proceduralisation. This second part of this article begins to develop one of those forms, 'thick' proceduralisation, building on but modifying Habermas's model of deliberative democracy in two important respects. First, it is argued that it is not sufficient simply to call for deliberation for there is a real likelihood that even if all deliberants can be brought together true communication will be blocked by difference; difference in the modes of discourse, the techniques of argument, language and validity claims. Discourse may therefore have to be mediated through the adoption of strategies of translation, mapping and dispute resolution. Whether regulators can or should perform such a mediating role remains however an open question. Second, it is argued that deliberative modes of policy formation and regulation are compatible with more pluralist and polyarchical arrangements than Habermas allows, and indeed that such arrangements may need to be adopted for thick proceduralisation to become operative.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://ojls.oxfordjournals.org/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2000 Oxford University Press |
| Divisions: | Law Centre for Analysis of Risk & Regulation |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Nov 2008 11:48 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 21:21 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/7519 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
