Gaskell, George, Stares, Sally 
ORCID: 0000-0003-4697-0347 and Kronberger, Nicole
(2011)
The public’s view of science.
In: Bennett, David J. and Jennings, Richard C., (eds.)
Successful Science Communication: Telling It Like It Is.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 60-76.
ISBN 9781107003323
Abstract
The focus in this chapter is on public perceptions of science, taking biotechnology and the life sciences as an exemplar. From almost its outset in 1974, with the application to patent recombinant DNA, biotechnology has been understood as having far-reaching implications for the lives of us all. In 1975, scientists agreed at the Asilomar Conference in California to a voluntary moratorium on their research, such was the scale of their concern about the potential and unknown health and safety issues associated with this new technology. But the economic benefits of biotechnology soon became its focal point, and the moratorium was soon lifted. In 1979 a European Community report entitled The Biosociety described biotechnology as central to economic competitiveness in subsequent years. But even at that time, the European public was uneasy and troubled by the idea of gene technology. As Mark Cantley, then a senior member of the European Commission, wrote, ‘what the sector ignored above all was public perception . . . the public were learning to see gene technology, genetic engineering, biotechnology and so on as a single, vague and disquieting phenomenon’ (Cantley 1992). A Eurobarometer survey in 1979 found that 49 per cent of the European public saw genetic research as an unacceptable risk and a similar percentage thought the same about ‘synthetic food’, or what we now call GM food (Gaskell 2004). However, the early warning signals from the public went unheeded. In the 1990s, the life sciences project, embracing medical, pharmaceutical, industrial and agri-food technologies based on recombinant DNA, took off led by European and North American multinational companies. They based their strategy on the market model of innovation, depicted in Figure 4.1 (Gaskell 2008). Here success in the process of innovation is contingent on gaining the support of the regulators and the market forces.
| Item Type: | Book Section |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/what-we-publish/boo... |
| Additional Information: | © 2011 Cambridge University Press |
| Divisions: | Centre for Analysis of Risk & Regulation |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Dec 2016 14:27 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 17:34 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/68687 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
