Pinchbeck, Ted (2016) Taking care of the budget? Practice-level outcomesduring commissioning reforms in England. SERC discussion papers (SERCDP0192). Spatial Economics Research Centre, London, UK.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (873kB) | Preview |
Abstract
I investigate whether vesting budgets with doctors impacts treatment decisions and patients outcomes by exploiting the transitional phase of major recent health care reforms in England that passed budgets to consortia of General Practitioners (GPs). Applying difference-indifference techniques to balanced treatment and control groups, I find that practices becoming actively responsible for consortia budgets engaged in cost-saving prescribing and referral behaviour but that patients in these practices experienced a relative deterioration in the quality of their care. I discuss a number of explanations for these results, including that the reforms incentivised doctors to reduce quality in order to save cash or that they simply distracted those doctors most closely involved.
Item Type: | Monograph (Discussion Paper) |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://www.spatialeconomics.ac.uk/ |
Additional Information: | © 2016 The Author |
Divisions: | Spatial Economics Research Centre Centre for Economic Performance |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor |
JEL classification: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies > J61 - Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies > J62 - Job, Occupational, and Intergenerational Mobility |
Date Deposited: | 17 May 2016 11:40 |
Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 20:35 |
Funders: | Economic and Social Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/66532 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |