Hall, Matthew (2014) The Supreme Court is constrained by public opinion in cases where the justices fear nonimplementation of their decisions. LSE American Politics and Policy (29 Apr 2014). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (302kB) | Preview |
Abstract
With each controversial case they hear, questions arise about the influence of public opinion on the Supreme Court. Matthew Hall examines the types of cases where the Supreme Court appears constrained, and finds when a ruling must be implemented by government actors outside the judicial hierarchy, external pressures exert a stronger influence on the Court. He argues that nonimplementation fears are only relevant to a small subset of cases in the Supreme Court docket, indicating that judicial scholars should be attentive to different contexts rather than searching for universal tendencies of the Court’s behavior.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2014 The Author |
| Divisions: | Accounting |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Aug 2014 14:39 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 13:43 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/58862 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics