Robson, Ruthann (2014) Supreme Court cases over the “contraceptive mandate” are dominated by issues of corporate personhood, religious beliefs, and sexual equality. LSE American Politics and Policy (22 Jan 2014). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (309kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This spring, the Supreme Court will hear two cases about the legality of the so-called “contraceptive mandate” in Obamacare, which obliges employer-sponsored health insurance to cover the costs of contraception. Ruthann Robson explains that these cases unite issues of corporate personhood, religious beliefs, sexual equality, and the role of the government. She argues that in order to resolve these conflicts, the judiciary must keep a mind toward the slippery slope arguments provided by both sides and confront and craft limiting principles in their ruling.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2014 The Author |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Jul 2014 09:25 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 13:42 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/58486 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics