Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

An analysis of subject areas and country participation for all health-related projects in the EU's FP5 and FP6 programmes

Galsworthy, M. J., Irwin, R., Charlesworth, K., Ernst, K., Hristovski, D., Wismar, M. and McKee, M. (2014) An analysis of subject areas and country participation for all health-related projects in the EU's FP5 and FP6 programmes. European Journal of Public Health, 24 (3). pp. 514-520. ISSN 1101-1262

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt075

Abstract

Background: Previous analyses concerning health components of European Union (EU)-funded research have shown low project participation levels of the 12 newest member states (EU-12). Additionally, there has been a lack of subject-area analysis. In the Health Research for Europe project, we screened all projects of the EU's Framework Programmes for research FP5 and FP6 (1998-2006) to identify health research projects and describe participation by country and subject area. Methods: FP5 and FP6 project databases were acquired and screened by coders to identify health-related projects, which were then categorized according to the 47 divisions of the EU Health Portal (N = 2728 projects) plus an extra group of 'basic/biotech' projects (N = 1743). Country participation and coordination rates for projects were also analyzed. Results: Approximately 20% of the 26 946 projects (value €29.2bn) were health-related (N = 4756. Value €6.04bn). Within the health categories, the largest expenditures were cancer (11.9%), 'other' (i.e. not mental health or cardiovascular) non-communicable diseases (9.5%) and food safety (9.4%). One hundred thirty-two countries participated in these projects. Of the 27 EU countries (and five partner countries), north-western and Nordic states acquired more projects per capita. The UK led coordination with > 20% of projects. EU-12 countries were generally under-represented for participation and coordination. Conclusions: Combining our findings with the associated literature, we comment on drivers determining distribution of participation and funds across countries and subject areas. Additionally, we discuss changes needed in the core EU projects database to provide greater transparency, data exploitation and return on investment in health research.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://eurpub.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/3/514
Additional Information: © The Author 2013.
Divisions: LSE
Subjects: C Auxiliary Sciences of History > C Auxiliary sciences of history (General)
Date Deposited: 24 Jun 2014 14:42
Last Modified: 06 Jan 2024 23:48
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/57139

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item