Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2009) Values compared. Polish Journal of Philosophy, 3 (1). pp. 73-96. ISSN 1897-1652
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Gert (2004) has suggested that several different types of value relations, including parity, can be clearly distinguished from each other if one interprets value comparisons as normative assessments of preference, while allowing for two levels of normativity - requirement and permission. While this basic idea is attractive, the particular modeling Gert makes use of is flawed. This paper presents an alternative modeling, developed in Rabinowicz (2008), and a general taxonomy of binary value relations. Another version of value analysis is then brought in, which appeals to appropriate emotions rather than preferences. It is also shown what the modeling of value relations would look like from such an emotion-centered perspective. The preference-based and the emotion-based approaches differ importantly from each other, but they give rise to isomorphic taxonomies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.pjp.edu.pl/index.htm |
| Additional Information: | © 2009 Institute of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University |
| Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Nov 2013 15:52 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 22:45 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/54528 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
