Public policy and inequalities of choice and autonomy

Burchardt, Tania ORCID: 0000-0003-4822-4954, Evans, Martin and Holder, Holly (2013) Public policy and inequalities of choice and autonomy. CASEpapers (174). Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London, UK.

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (704kB) | Preview

• Publisher

Abstract

This article explores the conceptualisation of choice as autonomy using three components – self-reflection, active decision-making, and quality and range of options - and investigates empirical inequalities in autonomy, using newly-collected data for the UK. ‘Choice’ has been promoted in social policy across many developed welfare states, often on the grounds that it is instrumentally valuable: choice by service users is said to incentivise providers to enhance quality and efficiency. But egalitarian and capability-based theories of social justice support the idea that choice – understood in the deeper sense of autonomy – has an intrinsic value. The empirical findings indicate that disabled people are most likely to experience constrained autonomy in all respects, while being from a low socio-economic group and/or lacking educational qualifications is a risk factor across several components. The fact that limited autonomy maps onto existing socio-economic disadvantage is not surprising, but points to the importance of taking into account underlying inequalities when developing choice-based policies. We conclude that improving the ‘choice’ agenda for policy requires opportunities for people to reflect on their objectives throughout the life course and that the removal of barriers to active decision-making would require effective support and advocacy, especially for disabled people. We suggest that major structural inequalities associated with restricted autonomy should be addressed – poverty, ill health and geographical inequality – because they place significant restrictions on the autonomy of those who are already disadvantaged as well as their immediate effects on living standards and quality of life.

Item Type:	Monograph (Report)
Official URL:	http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/case
Additional Information:	© 2013 The Authors
Divisions:	Social Policy Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
JEL classification:	I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare; Basic Needs; Living Standards; Quality of Life; Happiness I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty > I39 - Other
Date Deposited:	01 Aug 2013 07:55
Last Modified:	12 Dec 2024 05:59
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/51267

Actions (login required)

View Item