Gearty, Conor 
ORCID: 0000-0002-3885-2650
(2003)
Revisiting section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act.
Law Quarterly Review, 119 (Oct).
pp. 551-553.
ISSN 0023-933X
Abstract
Discusses difficulties with the interpretation of the Human Rights Act 1998 s.3(1). Considers the House of Lords ruling in Re S (Children) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan) in which s.3(1) was interpreted as meaning that a reading of legislation should not depart substantially from a fundamental feature of an Act of Parliament. Refutes criticisms of the author's article Reconciling Parliamentary Democracy and Human Rights in L.Q.R. 2002, 118(Apr), 248-269 made by Gavin Phillipson in (Mis)-reading Section 3 of the Human Rights Act in L.Q.R. 2003, 119(Apr), 183-188.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/Journal... |
| Additional Information: | © 2003 Sweet & Maxwell and its Contributors |
| Divisions: | LSE Human Rights Law |
| Subjects: | K Law > KD England and Wales J Political Science > JC Political theory |
| Date Deposited: | 02 May 2008 15:34 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 21:43 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/4620 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
