Courts of many minds

Spiekermann, Kai ORCID: 0000-0003-4983-5589 and Goodin, Robert E. (2012) Courts of many minds. British Journal of Political Science, 42 (3). pp. 555-571. ISSN 0007-1234

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (906kB) | Preview

• Author

Abstract

In 'A constitution of many minds' Cass Sunstein argues that the three major approaches to constitutional interpretation – Traditionalism, Populism and Cosmopolitanism – all rely on some variation of a ‘many-minds’ argument. Here we assess each of these claims through the lens of the Condorcet Jury Theorem. In regard to the first two approaches we explore the implications of sequential influence among courts (past and foreign, respectively). In regard to the Populist approach, we consider the influence of opinion leaders.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJourna...
Additional Information:	© 2012 Cambridge University Press
Divisions:	Government
Subjects:	J Political Science > JA Political science (General) K Law > K Law (General)
Date Deposited:	20 Jun 2012 13:19
Last Modified:	06 Jan 2024 02:48
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/44438

Actions (login required)

View Item