The eternal divide?: history and international relations

Lawson, George (2012) The eternal divide?: history and international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 18 (2). pp. 203-226. ISSN 1354-0661

Preview

PDF Download (446kB) | Preview

Abstract

On one level, history is used by all parts of the International Relations (IR) discipline. But lurking beneath the surface of IR’s approach to history lies a well-entrenched binary. Whereas mainstream positions use history as a means to fill in their theoretical frames (seeing history as a kind of ‘scripture’ of abstract lessons), many post-positivists reduce history to a pick-and-mix of contingent hiccups (a ‘butterfly’ of what-ifs and maybes). Interestingly enough, this binary is one reproduced throughout the social sciences. As such, there is a bigger story to the apparently ‘eternal divide’ between history and social science than first meets the eye. This article uses the various ways in which history is used — and abused — in IR to probe more deeply into the relationship between history and social science as a whole. This exploration reveals four frameworks, two drawn from history (context and narrative) and two drawn from social science (eventfulness and ideal-typification) which illustrate the necessary co-implication of the two enterprises. The article employs these tools as a means of re-imagining the relationship between history and social science (including IR), conceiving this as a single intellectual journey in which both are permanently in view.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://ejt.sagepub.com/
Additional Information:	© 2012 European Consortium of Political Research
Divisions:	International Relations IGA: LSE IDEAS
Subjects:	D History General and Old World > D History (General) J Political Science > JZ International relations
Date Deposited:	18 Jan 2012 15:43
Last Modified:	12 Dec 2024 00:05
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/41575

Actions (login required)

View Item