Howson, Colin (2012) Modelling uncertain inference. Synthese, 186 (2). pp. 475-492. ISSN 0039-7857
Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1007/s11229-011-9995-4
Abstract
Kyburg's opposition to the subjective Bayesian theory, and in particular to its advocates' indiscriminate and often questionable use of Dutch Book arguments, is documented and much of it strongly endorsed. However, it is argued that an alternative version, proposed by both de Finetti at various times during his long career, and by Ramsey, is less vulnerable to Kyburg's misgivings. This is a logical interpretation of the formalism, one which, it is argued, is both more natural and also avoids other, widely-made objections to Bayesianism.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.springerlink.com/content/0039-7857/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2012 Springer |
| Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 03 Jan 2012 14:04 |
| Last Modified: | 25 Sep 2024 04:45 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/40810 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
