Decision making in committees: transparency, reputation, and voting rules

Levy, Gilat (2007) Decision making in committees: transparency, reputation, and voting rules. American Economic Review, 97 (1). pp. 150-168. ISSN 0002-8282

Preview

PDF Download (386kB) | Preview

Abstract

In this paper I analyze the effect of the transparency of the decision making process in committees on the decisions that are eventually taken. I focus on committees whose members are motivated by career concerns, so that each member tries to enhance his own reputation. When the decision making process is secretive, the individual votes of the committee members are not exposed to the public but only the final decision. Thus, individuals are evaluated according to the group's decision. I find that in such a case, group members are induced to comply with preexisting biases. For example, if the voting rule demands a supermajority to accept a reform, individuals vote more often against reforms and exacerbate the conservatism of the voting rule. When the decision making process becomes transparent and individual votes are observed, this effect disappears and such committees are then more likely to accept reforms. I also find that coupled with the right voting rule, a secretive procedure may induce better decisions than a transparent one.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/
Additional Information:	© 2007 American Economic Association
Divisions:	Economics
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
JEL classification:	D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Economic Models of Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
Date Deposited:	22 Sep 2008 11:33
Last Modified:	02 Apr 2024 21:54
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/3697

Actions (login required)

View Item