Dietrich, Franz (2005) How to reach legitimate decisions when the procedure is controversial. Social Choice and Welfare, 24 (2). pp. 363-393. ISSN 0176-1714
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Imagine a group that faces a decision problem but does not agree on which decision procedure is appropriate. In that case, can a decision be reached that respects the procedural concerns of the group? There is a sense in which legitimate decisions are possible even if people disagree on which procedure to use. I propose to decide in favour of an option which maximizes the number of persons whose judged-right procedure happens to entail this decision given the profile. This decision rule is based not only on a profile in the standard sense, but in addition on a profile of judged-right procedures. To justify this decision rule, I present a set of simple axioms leading to it as the only solution.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.springerlink.com/content/0176-1714/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2005 Springer |
| Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method CPNSS |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic |
| Date Deposited: | 03 May 2011 11:49 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Jan 2024 06:03 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/35829 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
