Dolan, Paul, Gudex, Claire, Kind, Paul and Williams, Alan (1996) Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. Journal of Health Economics, 15 (2). pp. 209-231. ISSN 0167-6296
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
In eliciting health state valuations, two widely used methods are the standard gamble (SG) and the time trade-off (TTO). Both methods make assumptions about individual preferences that are too restrictive to allow them to act as perfect proxies for utility. Therefore, a choice between them might instead be made on empirical grounds. This paper reports on a study which compared a “props” (using specially-designed boards) and a “no props” (using self-completion booklets) variant of each method. The results suggested that both no props variants might be susceptible to framing effects and that TTO props outperformed SG props.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescriptio... |
| Additional Information: | © 1996 Elsevier Science B.V. |
| Divisions: | Social Policy |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine |
| JEL classification: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Mar 2011 10:53 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Nov 2024 00:30 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/33303 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
