Questioning consensus in social representations theory

Rose, Diana, Efraim, Danielle, Gervais, Marie-Claude, Joffe, Helene, Jovchelovitch, Sandra ORCID: 0000-0002-0073-2792 and Morant, Nicola (1995) Questioning consensus in social representations theory. Papers on Social Representations, 4 (2). pp. 150-176. ISSN 1021-5573

Preview

PDF Download (238kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper by the LSE Social Representations Group, challenges the notion that consensus defined as 'agreement in opinion' is at the heart of the theory of social representations. We suggest that the problem of consensus is a highly complex aspect of social life requiring appraisal. Consensus refers neither to mere agreement nor to the mere sharedness of attitudes, opinions and values by a social group. While these are the most common interpretations circulating in the literature, they fail to apprehend the different levels of analysis required to understand the social construction of symbolic realities. In this paper we criticise the most common notions of consensus and propose an alternative view. There is space in the theory of social representations to develop a more refined approach to the issue. We make use of this space in order to construct our argument that consensus in social representations exists at several levels. We propose the idea of a representational field simultaneously characterised by consensus, inconsistency and ambivalence. The issue of power within this heterogenous representational field is discussed.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://www.psr.jku.at/
Additional Information:	© 1995 The Authors
Divisions:	Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Date Deposited:	31 Jul 2007
Last Modified:	13 Sep 2024 21:03
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/2590

Actions (login required)

View Item