Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

‘Ambivalent’ individual preferences towards biotechnology in the European Union: products or processes?

Costa-i-Font, Joan ORCID: 0000-0001-7174-7919 and Mossialos, Elias (2005) ‘Ambivalent’ individual preferences towards biotechnology in the European Union: products or processes? Journal of Risk Research, 8 (4). pp. 341-354. ISSN 1366-9877

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1080/1366987042000275091

Abstract

Significant ambivalence is found when examining the explanatory dimensions of attitudes towards biotechnology in the European Union; individuals' decision—making is influenced by their perception of significant benefits and risks as well as moral concerns. In quantitatively analyzing the determinants of attitudes, we argue that it might be misleading to interpret attitudes towards new biotechnology applications without taking into account the existence of significant ambivalence in revealed preferences. This paper empirically examines the magnitude and the impact of ambivalence in explaining support for two specific biotech applications (Genetically Modified (GM) food and GM medicines). The data employed are from the 1999 Eurobarometer Survey 52.1. Results reveal that although between 35 and 45% of respondents display ambivalent attitudes towards biotechnology applications, ambivalence primarily affects less supportive attitudes, and this result seems robust among specific biotech applications. Ambivalence is expected to continue to play a key role in determining individual attitudes as long as available information continues to be limited. Furthermore, ambivalence, as well as attitudes to biotechnology applications, seems to be associated with the dimensions of the technology itself. Therefore, in the design of risk communication policies, decision makers should ensure that individuals are well informed if public perceptions are to be taken into account in public policy formation.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13669877.as...
Additional Information: © 2005 Taylor & Francis
Divisions: Social Policy
European Institute
LSE Health
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Date Deposited: 26 Nov 2009 16:19
Last Modified: 24 Jan 2024 03:30
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/25898

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item