Scott, Andrew 
ORCID: 0009-0002-4421-3860
(2007)
The same river twice? Jameel v. Wall Street Journal Europe.
Communications Law, 12 (2).
pp. 52-59.
ISSN 1746-7616
Abstract
Examines the House of Lords rulings in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd and Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL (No.3) on whether the qualified privilege defence to libel applied to the publication by newspapers of information on matters of public concern. Considers the impact of the Reynolds ruling, arguing that the tests for the defence of qualified privilege developed in the case have led to uncertainties on key questions. Discusses the response of the House of Lords in the Jameel case to criticisms of the operation of the Reynolds defence.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.tottelpublishing.com/723/Tottel-Publish... |
| Additional Information: | © 2007 Communications Law |
| Divisions: | Law |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 26 May 2009 09:47 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 23:09 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/24093 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
