Can we learn anything from economic geography proper?

Overman, Henry G. ORCID: 0000-0002-3525-7629 (2003) Can we learn anything from economic geography proper? CEPDP (586). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance, London, UK. ISBN 0753016648

Preview

PDF Download (231kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper considers the ways geographers (proper) and (geographical) economists approach the study of economic geography. It argues that there are two areas where the approach of the latter is more robust than the former. First, formal models both enforce internal consistency and allow one to move from micro to macro behaviour. Second, empirical work tends to be more rigorous, emphasising the importance of getting representative samples, testing whether findings are significant, identifying and testing empirical predictions from theory and dealing with issues of observational equivalence. But any approach can be improved and so the paper also identifies ways in which geographical economists could learn from the direction taken by economic geographers proper.

Item Type:	Monograph (Discussion Paper)
Official URL:	http://cep.lse.ac.uk
Additional Information:	© 2003 Henry G. Overman
Divisions:	Centre for Economic Performance Geography & Environment
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
JEL classification:	B - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology B - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional; Evolutionary F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies
Date Deposited:	28 Jul 2008 13:15
Last Modified:	13 Sep 2024 19:49
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/20024

Actions (login required)

View Item