Smart, Michael and Sturm, Daniel M. ORCID: 0000-0001-6408-8089 (2006) Term limits and electoral accountability. CEPDP (770). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance, London, UK. ISBN 0753019876
|
PDF
Download (308kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Periodic elections are the main instrument through which voters can hold politicians accountable. From this perspective term limits, which restrict voters’ ability to reward politicians with re-election, appear counterproductive. We show that despite the disciplining effect of elections, term limits can be ex ante welfare improving from the perspective of voters. By reducing the value of holding office term limits can induce politicians to implement policies that are closer to their private preferences. Such “truthful” behavior by incumbents in turn results in better screening of incumbents. We show that the combination of these two effects can strictly increase the utility of voters.
Item Type: | Monograph (Discussion Paper) |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://cep.lse.ac.uk |
Additional Information: | © 2006 the authors |
Divisions: | Centre for Economic Performance STICERD |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
JEL classification: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Economic Models of Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jul 2008 14:54 |
Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 19:59 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/19771 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |