Greenwashing and trust via enhanced self-regulation: the case of ESG rating providers in sustainable finance

Smolenska, Agnieszka ORCID: 0000-0001-7703-7686 and Levi-Faur, David (2025) Greenwashing and trust via enhanced self-regulation: the case of ESG rating providers in sustainable finance. Regulation and Governance. ISSN 1748-5983

Text (Regulation Governance - 2025 - Smoleńska - Greenwashing and Trust via Enhanced Self‐Regulation The Case of ESG Rating) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (555kB)

• Scopus publication

Abstract

Polycentric governance is a trust-intensive and trust-dependent governance that should actively seek to build and restore trust. The different ways in which this is done are poorly understood. Our study of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies and the green transition clarifies the role of enhanced self-regulation and intermediaries in trust-building and trust-repair in polycentric governance. ESG rating providers as intermediaries may help to build and repair trust, but as with any trustee, they represent a trust challenge as well. This article addresses these issues and is organized around three major questions: First, what are the political dynamics around the adoption of the rules for ESG ratings providers in the EU and United Kingdom? Second, what are the differences between the trust-building and the trust-repair strategies deployed? Third, how do these differences reflect the different approaches to the trust challenges of regulation by and of intermediaries? We apply process tracing and a comparative analysis of the regulation of ESG rating providers to generate insights into the trust-building and trust-repair strategies of rule-makers. Our analysis leads us to identify varieties of enhanced self-regulation that are differentiated by the regulatory strategies adopted by the rule-makers vis-à-vis regulatory intermediaries. We show how such efforts may combine different elements of mandatory and voluntary regulation, and we shed light on the differentiated conceptualizations and complexities of the function of trust in polycentric governance regimes as a whole.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions:	Grantham Research Institute
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions K Law > K Law (General) J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
JEL classification:	G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G18 - Government Policy and Regulation G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G30 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounting; Environmental Equity D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief
Date Deposited:	12 Dec 2025 17:00
Last Modified:	13 Jan 2026 11:33
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/130609

Actions (login required)

View Item