Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Conceptualizing age‐appropriate social media to support children's digital futures

Livingstone, Sonia ORCID: 0000-0002-3248-9862 and Sylwander, Kim ORCID: 0000-0003-4733-6487 (2025) Conceptualizing age‐appropriate social media to support children's digital futures. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. ISSN 0261-510X

[img] Text (British J of Dev Psycho - 2025 - Livingstone - Conceptualizing age‐appropriate social media to support children s digital) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (317kB)

Identification Number: 10.1111/bjdp.70006

Abstract

Is there really a ‘right age’ for social media? As governments rush to regulate children's digital lives, age‐based bans and ‘age‐appropriate’ design regulations are gaining international momentum. However, these are often based on theoretically dated ‘ages and stages’ models and blunt age thresholds. This article examines three seemingly divergent yet surprisingly convergent approaches. First, emerging regulatory frameworks are embedding ‘age‐appropriate’ design and bright‐line age limits. Second, social science research on children's digital experience, offers valuable documentation of developmental variability across ages but provides limited policy‐ready guidance and often lacks developmental theory. Third, a normative child rights framework grounded in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child's principle of ‘evolving capacities’ urges a balance between protection and participation rights in ways that take into account children's variable capacities and increasing autonomy. Given the often fraught and contested nature of the debates over digital policy, we call on developmental psychologists to scrutinize proposed age thresholds, map developmental evidence to diverse contexts, and bring contemporary theory and robust evidence to inform policy. Without this input, decisions that matter to children's digital lives will be left to political expediency and corporate interests, overlooking or even undermining children's rights and developmental needs.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions: Media and Communications
Subjects: T Technology
H Social Sciences
Date Deposited: 04 Jul 2025 12:48
Last Modified: 25 Jul 2025 16:03
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/128636

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics