Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Perceptions of Brazil’s Bolsa Família cash transfer programme, life opportunities and mental health in the lives of young adults from the outskirts of São Paulo: qualitative study

Malvasi, Paulo, Evans-Lacko, Sara ORCID: 0000-0003-4691-2630, Cyhlarova, Eva ORCID: 0000-0002-1755-6676, Matijasevich, Alicia, McDaid, David ORCID: 0000-0003-0744-2664 and Paula, Cristiane Silvestre (2025) Perceptions of Brazil’s Bolsa Família cash transfer programme, life opportunities and mental health in the lives of young adults from the outskirts of São Paulo: qualitative study. BJPsych Open, 11 (4). ISSN 2056-4724

[img] Text (perceptions-of-brazils-bolsa-familia-cash-transfer-programme-life-opportunities-and-mental-health-in-the-lives-of-young-adults-from-the-outskirts-of-sao-paulo-qualitative) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (285kB)
Identification Number: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10056

Abstract

Backgound Cash transfer programmes (CTPs) provide financial support to alleviate poverty and promote economic stability. The Bolsa Família Programme (BFP), a Brazilian initiative and the world’s largest CTP by number of beneficiaries, aims to improve living conditions. While poverty is closely linked to poor mental health, evidence regarding the specific effects of CTPs on young adults’ mental health remains limited, underscoring the need for further research. Aims To understand the meaning attributed to the BFP by young adults regarding their future aspirations and mental health, as well as perspectives from providers. Method This qualitative study was conducted at the outskirts of São Paulo city, involving 12 in-depth interviews with young adults aged 18–24 years and 2 focus groups comprising 17 health and social assistance professionals. Results Thematic analysis identified four themes according with interviews and focus groups: (a) perceptions about poverty (hopelessness and lack of opportunities); (b) impact of poverty on mental health (anxiety, unpredictability and hopelessness as consequences of living in poverty); (c) young adults’ needs and aspirations (job opportunities as the main expectation for a better future); and (d) BFP limitations and opportunities for improvement (BFP perceived as just one of the survival strategies but not impacting life opportunities for young adults). Conclusions The BFP was valued as essential for meeting poor families’ basic needs. Employment opportunities were central to young adults’ expectations, often causing anguish and anxiety. Expanding the BFP to include employment and income-generation policies could better support the mental health and life opportunities of vulnerable youth.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions: Care Policy and Evaluation Centre
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
Date Deposited: 01 Jul 2025 08:09
Last Modified: 01 Jul 2025 08:09
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/128105

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics