‘Not as bad as I thought’: economic attitudes and motivated reasoning in coalition governments

Kavetsos, Georgios, Krekel, Christian ORCID: 0000-0001-5960-3891 and Melios, George ORCID: 0000-0001-5027-9829 (2025) ‘Not as bad as I thought’: economic attitudes and motivated reasoning in coalition governments. Political Psychology. ISSN 0162-895X (In Press)

Text (Not_As_Bad_As_I_Thought) - Accepted Version Pending embargo until 1 January 2100. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (874kB)

Abstract

Two prominent mechanisms have been advanced to explain the effects of election outcomes on economic attitudes/perceptions: partisan competence attribution, based on voters’ genuine belief of an elected party’s competence; and partisan motivated reasoning, where voters change their economic attitudes so as to remain consistent with their past behaviour/view. To date, these two mechanisms have not been considered jointly. We draw on a unique, closely spaced, panel dataset around the 2013 German general elections to consider retrospective (past evaluations) and prospective (future expectations) attitudes about both one’s personal economic situation and that of the national economy. We find no evidence for competence attribution; voters of the future coalition parties do not expect higher household incomes nor their job situation to improve. We find changes in retrospective attitudes about the national economy, explained by partisan motivated reasoning given a political alliance that was negated and depreciated throughout the pre-election period. We discuss the implications these results have.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions:	Psychological and Behavioural Science Hellenic Observatory
Subjects:	J Political Science B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Date Deposited:	10 Mar 2025 15:30
Last Modified:	10 Mar 2025 15:33
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/127528

Actions (login required)

View Item