Epistemic injustice in the criminal trial: engaging with Gonzales Rose, Herdy, Jalloh and Ouwsu-Bempah

Picinali, Federico ORCID: 0000-0001-5085-9700 (2025) Epistemic injustice in the criminal trial: engaging with Gonzales Rose, Herdy, Jalloh and Ouwsu-Bempah. Quaestio Facti, 2025 (8). pp. 1-12. ISSN 2660-4515

Text (Picinali-Epistemic-injustice_in_the_criminal_trial) - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (619kB)

• Scopus publication

Abstract

Jasmine Gonzales Rose, Rachel Herdy, Tareeq Jalloh and Abenaa Owusu-Bempah have each written a paper commenting on my essay «Evidential Reasoning, Testimonial Injustice and the Fairness of the Criminal Trial», which appeared in Quaestio Facti in 2024. In this reply I engage with their insightful works. I discuss the advantages of framing in terms of «contributory injustice» the scenarios analysed in my original essay. I briefly study the conditions for the existence of a correlation between credibility excess and credibility deficit. And I provide the sketch of a theory of trial fairness, which I am currently developing elsewhere.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2025 The Author
Divisions:	Law LSE
Subjects:	K Law
Date Deposited:	11 Feb 2025 17:54
Last Modified:	11 Feb 2025 17:54
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/127283

Actions (login required)

View Item