Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

When can we trust regression discontinuity design estimates from close elections? Evidence from experimental benchmarks

De Magalhaes, Leandro, Hangartner, Dominik, Hirvonen, Salomo, Merilainen, Jaakko, Ruiz, Nelson A. and Tukiainen, Janne (2025) When can we trust regression discontinuity design estimates from close elections? Evidence from experimental benchmarks. Political Analysis. ISSN 1047-1987

[img] Text (when-can-we-trust-regression-discontinuity-design-estimates-from-close-elections-evidence-from-experimental-benchmarks) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (611kB)

Identification Number: 10.1017/pan.2024.28

Abstract

Regression discontinuity designs (RDD) are widely used in the social sciences to estimate causal effects from observational data. Following recent methodological advances, scholars can choose from various RDD estimators for point estimation and inference. This decision is mainly guided by theoretical results on optimality and Monte Carlo simulations because of a paucity of research on the performance of the different estimators in recovering real-world experimental benchmarks. Leveraging exact ties in personal votes in local elections in Colombia and Finland, which are resolved by a random lottery, we assess the performance of various estimators featuring different polynomial degrees, bias-correction methods, optimal bandwidths, and approaches to statistical inference. Using re-running and re-election as outcomes, we document only minor differences in the performance of the various implementation approaches when the conditional expectation function (CEF) of the outcomes in the vicinity of the discontinuity is close to linear. When approximating the curvature of the CEF is more challenging, bias-corrected and robust inference with coverage-error-rate-optimal bandwidths comes closer to the experimental benchmark than more widely used alternative implementations.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions: Government
Subjects: J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
Date Deposited: 28 Jan 2025 15:36
Last Modified: 28 Jan 2025 15:36
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/127099

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics